Please comment on whether the seminar contributed to your understanding of the CHIST-ERA framework (EC FET programme, national funding...), the follow-up process (yearly report & seminar, review...), the funders' strategic expectations (why this topic, this type of research, why transnational projects...). How this information sharing could be improved?
Please comment on whether the guidelines for preparing your presentation were clear, if you had enough opportunities to exchange with the funders' representatives, if the presentations and reports were clear and fulfilled your expectations, if you had enough opportunities to exchange with the project representatives, if the expectations of the funders were clear. How to better foster exchanges between participant groups?
Please comment on whether you had enough opportunities to exchange with other projects (on project management issues and/or scientific discussions). Within your topic and/or outside?
Please comment on the sessions about strategic analysis (identification of challenges and needs, elaboration of roadmaps, etc.). What is your general impression, was it useful for yourself? How went the discussions in the parallel sessions? How did you find the presentations in the plenary session? Do you have proposals for improvement?
Please comment on the logistics and organisation of the seminar (registration website, venue, networking dinner, atmosphere...). What are your suggestions for next year's seminar?